Inferencium/website
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Activity

Merge pull request 'Typo fixes.' (#8) from beta into stable

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
inference 2022-06-30 06:06:05 +02:00
commit 2af0b495ab
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
blog/untrusted-the-issue-with-decentralisation.html
View File

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ form of identification; this is where the trust issue of decentralisation<br>
occurs.</p>
<br>
<p>In the decentralised model, keys are kept on the users' devices, in their<br>
possession. While this soveriegnty is welcomed, it indroduces a critical<br>
possession. While this soveriegnty is welcomed, it introduces a critical<br>
flaw in the security of communicating with anyone via a decentralised<br>
platform; should a user's device be lost, stolen, or otherwise compromised,<br>
there is no way to know it happened and what the new keys really are, and<br>
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ they be compromised, by providing identification to the virtual private<br>
server host.<br>
<br>
3. I have pinned my website to a globally trusted certificate authority,<br>
Let's Encrypt, which is a trsuted party to manage TLS certificates and<br>
Let's Encrypt, which is a trusted party to manage TLS certificates and<br>
ensure ownership of the domain when connecting to it.<br>
<br>
4. I have enabled DNSSEC on my domain, so it is extremely difficult to<br>
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ implement in any form.</p>
<br>
<h4>Conclusion</h4>
<p>Do not demand anonymity; demand privacy and control of your own data.<br>
Complete anonmyity makes it impossible to have a root of trust, and is<br>
Complete anonymity makes it impossible to have a root of trust, and is<br>
typically never necessary. It is possible for someone else to hold your<br>
keys, without them taking control of them and dictating what you can and<br>
cannot do (Twitter's misinformation policy comes to mind). If a platform<br>