Update webpage "Blog - #3" from version "9.0.0-beta.1" to "9.0.1-beta.1"
This commit is contained in:
parent
127f7311fb
commit
7dcc0e2c62
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Inferencium - Website - Blog - #3 -->
|
||||
<!-- Version: 9.0.0-beta.1 -->
|
||||
<!-- Version: 9.0.1-beta.1 -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Copyright 2022 Jake Winters -->
|
||||
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause -->
|
||||
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause WITH AdditionRef-Inferencium-Personal-exception -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
|
||||
@ -44,68 +44,56 @@
|
||||
</nav>
|
||||
<section id="introduction">
|
||||
<h2><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></h2>
|
||||
<p>It's no secret that I'm an advocate of Chromium and will use it for the
|
||||
foreseeable future. It is a highly secure web browser which provides strong
|
||||
protection against malicious wesbites and the code they run, and, while I am not
|
||||
too interested in high performance, it is a very performant web browser, despite
|
||||
its security features.</p>
|
||||
<p>However, the intention of this blog post is not to promote Chromium for any
|
||||
reason, but rather show an issue with it; an issue which is larger than may be
|
||||
realised by web-surfing users. That issue is the large monopoly Chromium has in
|
||||
the web browser market;
|
||||
<p>It's no secret that I'm an advocate of Chromium and will use it for the foreseeable future.
|
||||
It is a highly secure web browser which provides strong protection against malicious wesbites
|
||||
and the code they run, and, while I am not too interested in high performance, it is a very
|
||||
performant web browser, despite its security features.</p>
|
||||
<p>However, the intention of this blog post is not to promote Chromium for any reason, but
|
||||
rather show an issue with it; an issue which is larger than may be realised by web-surfing
|
||||
users. That issue is the large monopoly Chromium has in the web browser market;
|
||||
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Summary_tables">Chromium's market share is around 65%</a>,
|
||||
making it the largest slice of the cake. The issue becomes even deeper and more
|
||||
problematic when you realise that the second-place web browser, Safari, has only
|
||||
an 18% market share.</p>
|
||||
<p>The main issue with this type of monopoly is the large amounts of power and
|
||||
influence it gives Chromium, which can lead to, and is leading to, excessive
|
||||
authority of how the web should work, and the standards which are implemented,
|
||||
which all other web browsers must comply with in order to have a fully working
|
||||
web.</p>
|
||||
making it the largest slice of the cake. The issue becomes even deeper and more problematic when
|
||||
you realise that the second-place web browser, Safari, has only an 18% market share.</p>
|
||||
<p>The main issue with this type of monopoly is the large amounts of power and influence it
|
||||
gives Chromium, which can lead to, and is leading to, excessive authority of how the web should
|
||||
work, and the standards which are implemented, which all other web browsers must comply with in
|
||||
order to have a fully working web.</p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<section id="solution">
|
||||
<h2><a href="#solution">Solution</a></h2>
|
||||
<p>In order to combat the Chromium monopoly, users typically go over to
|
||||
Chromium's classical rival, Firefox. However, Firefox is dying and has lost
|
||||
almost all of its userbase over the last 2-3 years; the reason for this is a
|
||||
tale of selfishness and greed, caused by Firefox's parent company to go off
|
||||
course and lose its original goal of providing a freedom-respecting, open web.
|
||||
Mozilla caused self-inflicted damage which it cannot recover from, and, to me,
|
||||
is already dead. The vultures are simply waiting for the final, small group of
|
||||
users to abandon the project before Firefox finally succumbs to its own demise;
|
||||
the demise it caused itself.</p>
|
||||
<p>If attempting to increase Firefox's market share to previous levels will be
|
||||
in vain, what is the solution? How can we prevent Chromium from completely
|
||||
taking over the web and dictating everything we do and how the web should be
|
||||
designed and used?</p>
|
||||
<p>To find the answer to these important but difficult questions, we must go to
|
||||
the alternatives which still have a fighting chance. Safari, developed by Apple,
|
||||
is based on WebKit, an engine completely independent of Chromium and
|
||||
Firefox.</p>
|
||||
<p>Just using a non-Chromium-based web browser is not enough; the choice must
|
||||
already have enough market share to still be relevant, and be capable of gaining
|
||||
new users. Safari, being preinstalled on Apple devices including iPhone and Mac,
|
||||
already has a great advantage over Firefox. Apple devices, especially iPhone, is
|
||||
abundant in streets everywhere on the planet. Safari is the default choice for
|
||||
Apple users and has a large market share simply because of how widespread it is.
|
||||
Exploiting this fact is the only way to gain more market share and take down
|
||||
Chromium before it is too late; the clock is ticking, and Apple are the only
|
||||
ones preventing Chromium from completely taking over the web. Backing Safari
|
||||
instead of Firefox will keep the WebKit market share from falling to a
|
||||
critically low percentage, making it impossible to make a comeback, as has
|
||||
happened to Firefox. Sometimes, directly supporting a political party is not the
|
||||
way to get them into power, supporting the second-place alternative is, in order
|
||||
to keep the one you don't want out of power, giving the party you do want in
|
||||
power an advantage. To win this war against the Chromium monopoly, we must be
|
||||
tactical, not emotional.</p>
|
||||
<p>In order to combat the Chromium monopoly, users typically go over to Chromium's classical
|
||||
rival, Firefox. However, Firefox is dying and has lost almost all of its userbase over the last
|
||||
2-3 years; the reason for this is a tale of selfishness and greed, caused by Firefox's parent
|
||||
company to go off course and lose its original goal of providing a freedom-respecting, open web.
|
||||
Mozilla caused self-inflicted damage which it cannot recover from, and, to me, is already dead.
|
||||
The vultures are simply waiting for the final, small group of users to abandon the project
|
||||
before Firefox finally succumbs to its own demise; the demise it caused itself.</p>
|
||||
<p>If attempting to increase Firefox's market share to previous levels will be in vain, what is
|
||||
the solution? How can we prevent Chromium from completely taking over the web and dictating
|
||||
everything we do and how the web should be designed and used?</p>
|
||||
<p>To find the answer to these important but difficult questions, we must go to the alternatives
|
||||
which still have a fighting chance. Safari, developed by Apple, is based on WebKit, an engine
|
||||
completely independent of Chromium and Firefox.</p>
|
||||
<p>Just using a non-Chromium-based web browser is not enough; the choice must already have
|
||||
enough market share to still be relevant, and be capable of gaining new users. Safari, being
|
||||
preinstalled on Apple devices including iPhone and Mac, already has a great advantage over
|
||||
Firefox. Apple devices, especially iPhone, is abundant in streets everywhere on the planet.
|
||||
Safari is the default choice for Apple users and has a large market share simply because of how
|
||||
widespread it is. Exploiting this fact is the only way to gain more market share and take down
|
||||
Chromium before it is too late; the clock is ticking, and Apple are the only ones preventing
|
||||
Chromium from completely taking over the web. Backing Safari instead of Firefox will keep the
|
||||
WebKit market share from falling to a critically low percentage, making it impossible to make a
|
||||
comeback, as has happened to Firefox. Sometimes, directly supporting a political party is not
|
||||
the way to get them into power, supporting the second-place alternative is, in order to keep the
|
||||
one you don't want out of power, giving the party you do want in power an advantage. To win this
|
||||
war against the Chromium monopoly, we must be tactical, not emotional.</p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<section id="conclusion">
|
||||
<h2><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></h2>
|
||||
<p>Supporting Safari is the first step in supporting WebKit and promoting usage
|
||||
of the independent web engine. Buying time while supporting and contributing to
|
||||
WebKit browser projects is the best and only chance anyone has at competing with
|
||||
Chromium, and preventing it from increasing its dominance to unstoppable levels,
|
||||
at which point there will be no return.</p>
|
||||
<p>Supporting Safari is the first step in supporting WebKit and promoting usage of the
|
||||
independent web engine. Buying time while supporting and contributing to WebKit browser projects
|
||||
is the best and only chance anyone has at competing with Chromium, and preventing it from
|
||||
increasing its dominance to unstoppable levels, at which point there will be no return.</p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<div class="sitemap-small"><a href="../sitemap">Sitemap</a></div>
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user